QQ登录

立即注册 找回密码 

查看: 619|回复: 0

[GMAT阅读题讨论] PREP2012阅读第8篇第5题

[复制链接]
icetong123 发表于 2015-1-9 11:45:54 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been eliminated by human
activity: mining, livestock grazing, timber harvesting, and agriculture as well as recreational
and urban development. The numerical effect is obvious: there are fewer salmon in degraded
regions than in pristine ones; however, habitat loss also has the potential to reduce genetic
diversity. This is most evident in cases where it results in the extinction of entire salmon
populations. Indeed, most analysts believe that some kind of environmental degradation
underlies the demise of many extinct salmon populations. Although some rivers have been
recolonized, the unique genes of the original populations have been lost.
Large-scale disturbances in one locale also have the potential to alter the genetic structure of
populations in neighboring areas, even if those areas have pristine habitats. Why? Although
the homing instinct of salmon to their natal stream is strong, a fraction of the fish returning
from the sea (rarely more than 15 percent) stray and spawn in nearby streams. Low levels of
straying are crucial, since the process provides a source of novel genes and a mechanism by
which a location can be repopulates should the fish there disappear. Yet high rates of straying
can be problematic because misdirected fish may interbreed with the existing stock to such a
degree that any local adaptations that are present become diluted. Straying rates remain
relatively low when environmental conditions are stable, but can increase dramatically when
streams suffer severe disturbance. The 1980 volcanic eruption of Mount Saint Helens, for
example, sent mud and debris into several tributaries of the Columbia River. For the next
couple of years, steelhead trout (a species included among the salmon ) returning from the
sea to spawn were forced to find alternative streams. As a consequence, their rates of
straying, initially 16 percent, rose to more than 40 percent overall.
Although no one has quantified changes in the rate of straying as a result of the disturbances
caused by humans, there is no reason to suspect that the effect would be qualitatively
different than what was seen in the aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption. Such a
dramatic increase in straying from damaged areas to more pristine streams results in
substantial gene flow, which can in turn lower the overall fitness of subsequent generations.


Which of the following does the author mention as support for the view that environmental
disturbances caused by human activity could increase straying rates?
A. The existence of salmon populations in rivers where the elimination of salmon habitat by
human activity had previously made the fish extinct
B. The results of studies measuring the impact on straying rates of habitat loss caused by
human activity
C. The potential for disturbances in one environment to cause the introduction of novel
genes into salmon populations in neighboring areas
D. The weaknesses in the view that the extinction of entire salmon populations is the only
mechanism by which human destruction of salmon habitat reduces genetic diversity in
salmon
E. The absence of any reason for believing that disturbances brought about by human
activity would differ in their effects from comparable disturbances brought about by
natural causes

答案与解析回复可见哦~



游客,如果您要查看本帖隐藏内容请回复



回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

gmat_prep:

最好用的考试论坛
http://bbs.bailiedu.com

最好用的考试论坛
http://bbs.bailiedu.com

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表